Russian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,367,792 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 51.6 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $44,595, a difference of 19.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $96,525, a difference of 14.4%), and median family income ($120,487 compared to $105,839, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $51,421, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $61,244, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and single female poverty (19.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.13%), female poverty (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 18.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.4%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.49%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 68.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 44.8%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.2%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.2% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.0%), high school diploma (91.5% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 11th grade (94.3% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.4%).