Lebanese vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 371,793,352 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Lebanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.554. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lebanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lebanese corresponds to a decrease of 18.0 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 4.7%), per capita income ($45,840 compared to $44,595, a difference of 2.8%), and median female earnings ($40,006 compared to $38,992, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,339 compared to $96,525, a difference of 0.84%), median family income ($107,086 compared to $105,839, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,734 compared to $103,507, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 34.1%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.2%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.9%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.010%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.2%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.31%).