Potawatomi vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Czechs

Fair
Excellent
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,456,310 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 61.3 Czechs.
Potawatomi Integration in Czech Communities

Potawatomi vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $103,507, a difference of 22.3%), median family income ($88,265 compared to $105,839, a difference of 19.9%), and median household income ($72,576 compared to $86,164, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $51,421, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($34,739 compared to $38,992, a difference of 12.2%).
Potawatomi vs Czech Income
Income MetricPotawatomiCzech
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
29.2%

Potawatomi vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Czech communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 37.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 11.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 16.1%).
Potawatomi vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiCzech
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Exceptional
9.2%

Potawatomi vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.3%).
Potawatomi vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiCzech
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%

Potawatomi vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
Potawatomi vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
83.9%

Potawatomi vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 18.7%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.8%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Potawatomi vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiCzech
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Excellent
30.5%

Potawatomi vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 28.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Potawatomi vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiCzech
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.4%

Potawatomi vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.8%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Potawatomi vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiCzech
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.9%

Potawatomi vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.7%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.9%), and ambulatory disability (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 7.4%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.2%).
Potawatomi vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiCzech
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%