Immigrants from Asia vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,706,752 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.823. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 7.6 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,933 compared to $86,164, a difference of 16.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $96,525, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $38,992, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $51,421, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $61,244, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.4%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.29%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 27.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 14.0%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.74%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and family households (66.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 57.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.1%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.5%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.5%).