Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,246,299 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $51,421, a difference of 8.4%), and median household income ($91,541 compared to $86,164, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,252 compared to $105,839, a difference of 0.39%), median earnings ($47,671 compared to $47,221, a difference of 0.95%), and median male earnings ($55,241 compared to $56,546, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.89%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.9%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.5%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.11, a difference of 8.0%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.55%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 94.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.5%).