Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Czechs

Poor
Excellent
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,093,334 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 64.8 Czechs.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Czech Communities

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 51.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $103,507, a difference of 13.3%), and median family income ($94,466 compared to $105,839, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $51,421, a difference of 2.4%), median earnings ($45,820 compared to $47,221, a difference of 3.1%), and median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $38,992, a difference of 5.0%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Income
Income MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzech
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,655
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,466
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,402
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,820
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,446
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,958
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,631
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,856
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,357
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,327
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
29.2%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 73.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.48%), single female poverty (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzech
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.0%
Exceptional
9.2%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 47.2%), and unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.7%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzech
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.7%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 41.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.5%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
83.9%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.6%), married-couple households (40.9% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and currently married (41.5% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzech
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.5%
Excellent
30.5%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 245.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 72.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 22.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 50.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 65.3%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzech
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
7.4%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.5%), and college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzech
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.6%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.7%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 41.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianCzech
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.4%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
23.9%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%