Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Nicaragua
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Nicaragua

Czechs

Fair
Excellent
3,407
SOCIAL INDEX
31.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
221st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Immigrants from Nicaragua Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,325,680 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 120.6 Czechs.
Immigrants from Nicaragua Integration in Czech Communities

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 26.9%), median family income ($88,267 compared to $105,839, a difference of 19.9%), and median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $56,546, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $51,421, a difference of 3.6%), median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $38,992, a difference of 8.2%), and median household income ($76,784 compared to $86,164, a difference of 12.2%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCzech
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,065
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,267
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,784
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,737
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,482
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,023
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,266
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,914
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$89,108
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,085
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
29.2%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 87.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 76.8%), and married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 76.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCzech
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Czech communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCzech
Unemployment
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 38.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.9%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.7%
Exceptional
83.9%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.6%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (67.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.11, a difference of 8.4%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCzech
Family Households
Exceptional
67.5%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.0%
Excellent
30.5%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 44.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 11.0%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCzech
No Vehicles Available
Good
9.9%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.4%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 106.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.9%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCzech
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.9%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.4%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.3%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.8%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaCzech
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%