Armenian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 294,899,765 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Armenian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Armenians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Armenians corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 17.7%), per capita income ($48,287 compared to $44,595, a difference of 8.3%), and median female earnings ($42,212 compared to $38,992, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,656 compared to $61,244, a difference of 0.67%), median male earnings ($58,134 compared to $56,546, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,002 compared to $103,507, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 37.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 37.6%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 37.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 32.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 16.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 36.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.1%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Armenian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.4%), self-care disability (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 48.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%), disability (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.7%).