Native/Alaskan vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,514,543 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $44,595, a difference of 34.0%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $105,839, a difference of 30.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $103,507, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $51,421, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $38,992, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $61,244, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 103.6%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 92.4%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 87.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 24.5%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 75.0%), male unemployment (7.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 70.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 42.1%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 52.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.5%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.3%), and professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 35.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.3%).