Taiwanese vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,133,997 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.573% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 1,573.4 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 16.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $96,525, a difference of 5.1%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $86,164, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,180 compared to $103,507, a difference of 0.65%), median family income ($107,295 compared to $105,839, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($47,902 compared to $47,221, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 24.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 47.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 29.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in currently married (45.8% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 8.9%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 69.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 67.0%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (60.7% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.5%).