Laotian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,371,024 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.200% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 200.0 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 10.6%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $86,164, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $96,525, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $56,546, a difference of 5.0%), per capita income ($47,041 compared to $44,595, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $51,421, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 25.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 7.2%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.3%).