South American Indian vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

South American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

South American Indians

Czechs

Average
Excellent
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in South American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,189,760 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.863. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.113% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 1,112.5 Czechs.
South American Indian Integration in Czech Communities

South American Indian vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 17.9%), median male earnings ($54,508 compared to $56,546, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $51,421, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,497 compared to $96,525, a difference of 0.030%), median earnings ($46,952 compared to $47,221, a difference of 0.57%), and per capita income ($44,206 compared to $44,595, a difference of 0.88%).
South American Indian vs Czech Income
Income MetricSouth American IndianCzech
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,206
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Good
$103,624
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,446
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Good
$46,952
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,508
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,019
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,979
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,497
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,171
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,215
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
29.2%

South American Indian vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 32.5%), receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
South American Indian vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricSouth American IndianCzech
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Fair
11.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Exceptional
9.2%

South American Indian vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.7%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.8%).
South American Indian vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSouth American IndianCzech
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%

South American Indian vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
South American Indian vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSouth American IndianCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
83.9%

South American Indian vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.9%), currently married (45.8% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.27%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
South American Indian vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSouth American IndianCzech
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Excellent
30.5%

South American Indian vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 75.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.3%).
South American Indian vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSouth American IndianCzech
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
7.4%

South American Indian vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.0%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.82%).
South American Indian vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricSouth American IndianCzech
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.5%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.0%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.3%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.9%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.8%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Good
1.9%

South American Indian vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.8%), female disability (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
South American Indian vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricSouth American IndianCzech
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.1%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%