Costa Rican vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,665,277 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 44.9 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 15.4%), median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $56,546, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $51,421, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $61,244, a difference of 0.64%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $103,507, a difference of 0.71%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $96,525, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 28.0%), receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.52%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.0%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.2%), currently married (46.5% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.91%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 38.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.6%), college, under 1 year (64.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (37.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.66%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Czech communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.84%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.7%).