Chickasaw vs Czech Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Czech
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Czechs
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czech Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,456,794 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 23.4 Czechs.
![Chickasaw Integration in Czech Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-czechs/chickasaw-vs-czechs-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs Czech Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,507, a difference of 25.9%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $105,839, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $96,525, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,992, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,244, a difference of 14.0%).
![Chickasaw vs Czech Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-czechs/chickasaw-vs-czechs-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Czech |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Good $44,595 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Excellent $105,839 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Good $86,164 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Good $47,221 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Excellent $56,546 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Poor $38,992 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Poor $51,421 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Good $96,525 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Excellent $103,507 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Average $61,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 29.2% |
Chickasaw vs Czech Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czech communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 46.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 44.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.3%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Czech Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-czechs/chickasaw-vs-czechs-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Czech |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Good 28.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Chickasaw vs Czech Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.1%).
![Chickasaw vs Czech Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-czechs/chickasaw-vs-czechs-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Czech |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw vs Czech Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
![Chickasaw vs Czech Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-czechs/chickasaw-vs-czechs-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Czech |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 43.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Chickasaw vs Czech Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.8%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.5%).
![Chickasaw vs Czech Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-czechs/chickasaw-vs-czechs-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Czech |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Excellent 30.5% |
Chickasaw vs Czech Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
![Chickasaw vs Czech Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-czechs/chickasaw-vs-czechs-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Czech |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 6.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 93.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Chickasaw vs Czech Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.20%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
![Chickasaw vs Czech Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-czechs/chickasaw-vs-czechs-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Czech |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Good 47.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Czech Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Czech communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 42.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Czech Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-czechs/chickasaw-vs-czechs-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Czech |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |