Alsatian vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,515,111 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 72.9 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 18.3%), per capita income ($47,284 compared to $44,595, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $51,421, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,023 compared to $47,221, a difference of 0.42%), householder income over 65 years ($61,797 compared to $61,244, a difference of 0.90%), and median household income ($85,053 compared to $86,164, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 35.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), single male poverty (15.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 58.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.8%), married-couple households (44.8% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.43%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (61.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 91.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.9%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (67.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.9%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), disability (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%).