Lithuanian vs Pueblo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,357,416 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.274% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 273.9 Pueblo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $32,012, a difference of 54.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,223 compared to $68,910, a difference of 52.7%), and median family income ($115,395 compared to $76,880, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $45,018, a difference of 19.0%), householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $52,930, a difference of 23.2%), and median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $32,564, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 180.8%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 136.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 106.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 22.2%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 35.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 43.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 70.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 59.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 81.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 56.6%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 5.4%), family households (64.0% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 35.6%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 72.7%), bachelor's degree (42.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 65.4%), and associate's degree (50.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 63.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 54.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 14.8%).