Pima vs Jamaican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,959,003 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.355. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Jamaicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 34.7 Jamaicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $39,231, a difference of 28.0%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $76,583, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $88,327, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,929, a difference of 1.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $83,933, a difference of 1.3%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 87.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 70.7%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 15.6%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 112.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 93.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 82.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 77.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 33.8%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.38%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 69.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 44.9%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 45.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 44.9%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.15%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 60.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.5%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.26%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.2%).