Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Jamaican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,705,342 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans within Immigrant from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Jamaicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina corresponds to a decrease of 12.8 Jamaicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 26.8%), median male earnings ($52,869 compared to $48,632, a difference of 8.7%), and per capita income ($42,278 compared to $39,231, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,886 compared to $38,670, a difference of 0.56%), householder income under 25 years ($50,565 compared to $50,929, a difference of 0.72%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,986 compared to $54,560, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 44.7%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 31.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.8%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 26.9%), and currently married (46.1% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.16%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and family households (61.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 80.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.9%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and bachelor's degree (37.6% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jamaican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.59%), male disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.0%).