Hispanic or Latino vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,191,626 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.354. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,688 compared to $50,303, a difference of 40.9%), median male earnings ($46,419 compared to $62,658, a difference of 35.0%), and median family income ($85,647 compared to $114,586, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,279 compared to $55,743, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,832 compared to $62,162, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 41.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 5.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 37.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 51.7%), births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 47.3%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.8%), family households (67.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.17, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 84.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 60.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 44.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 74.6%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 72.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.97%), nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.7%), female disability (12.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.1%).