French American Indian vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,886,024 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.905. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.376% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 375.8 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,899 compared to $107,393, a difference of 25.0%), per capita income ($40,244 compared to $50,303, a difference of 25.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $111,430, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $62,162, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $55,743, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 42.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 39.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 42.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.1%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.71%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and family households (62.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 60.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 43.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 48.6%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 47.2%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 41.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.6%).