Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Seminole Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,387,712 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Seminole within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Seminole. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Seminole.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,662 compared to $76,584, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,335 compared to $80,077, a difference of 36.5%), and per capita income ($49,316 compared to $36,180, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $52,373, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $45,649, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 52.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 50.9%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 37.5%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 51.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.2%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 59.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 57.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.0%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.3%).