Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Romania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Nepalese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Romania

Nepalese

Exceptional
Poor
9,314
SOCIAL INDEX
90.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
21st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,939
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
281st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Nepalese Integration in Immigrants from Romania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,096,692 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to a decrease of 48.9 Nepalese.
Immigrants from Romania Integration in Nepalese Communities

Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,463 compared to $38,442, a difference of 28.7%), median male earnings ($61,040 compared to $49,458, a difference of 23.4%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $54,472, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $58,761, a difference of 9.7%), and median female earnings ($42,718 compared to $38,603, a difference of 10.7%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from RomaniaNepalese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,463
Tragic
$38,442
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$113,434
Tragic
$94,153
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,222
Poor
$82,410
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,337
Tragic
$43,860
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,040
Tragic
$49,458
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,718
Tragic
$38,603
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,522
Exceptional
$54,472
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,713
Poor
$91,498
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,633
Tragic
$93,355
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,462
Tragic
$58,761
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
22.2%

Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 45.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from RomaniaNepalese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.0%
Fair
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
18.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.2%
Fair
29.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.6%

Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from RomaniaNepalese
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
18.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%

Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from RomaniaNepalese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Tragic
33.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
80.5%

Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.1%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 35.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.1%), married-couple households (48.3% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.42, a difference of 7.5%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from RomaniaNepalese
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
67.2%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
30.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Poor
45.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.42
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
33.5%

Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 54.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 45.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.2%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from RomaniaNepalese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
92.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Exceptional
61.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
24.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
8.7%

Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 98.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 70.0%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from RomaniaNepalese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.8%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
96.2%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
96.2%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
96.1%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
96.1%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
94.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
92.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
90.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
89.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Tragic
85.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Tragic
54.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.9%
Tragic
39.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.9%
Tragic
29.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 30.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 10.2%).
Immigrants from Romania vs Nepalese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from RomaniaNepalese
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
0.97%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
28.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%