Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Iraq Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,621,313 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Iraq. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Immigrants from Iraq.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $41,365, a difference of 10.6%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $52,681, a difference of 9.8%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $98,786, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $53,384, a difference of 3.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,066 compared to $89,444, a difference of 5.1%), and median household income ($78,166 compared to $82,594, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.8%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 31.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (67.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.5%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.2%), master's degree (11.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.23%), disability (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.76%).