Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,200,682 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Ethiopia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Immigrants from Ethiopia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $95,256, a difference of 25.5%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and median male earnings ($66,078 compared to $55,434, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $65,238, a difference of 7.7%), median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $42,744, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $53,408, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 24.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.5%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.9%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and family households (65.1% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 0.12%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.7%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 18.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%).