Navajo vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,468,172 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.947. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.204% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 204.2 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $45,663, a difference of 57.3%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $106,183, a difference of 49.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $103,536, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $50,379, a difference of 18.9%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $39,891, a difference of 20.7%), and wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 205.6%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 160.5%), and male poverty (22.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 134.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 41.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 45.2%), and single female poverty (31.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 54.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 119.4%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 116.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 116.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 38.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 41.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 16.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 75.0%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 59.1%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.31%), family households (66.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 76.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 68.4%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 62.8%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 55.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.0%).