Moroccan vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Moroccan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Moroccans

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Moroccan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,862,046 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.524. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to an increase of 32.4 Luxembourgers.
Moroccan Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Moroccan vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 14.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,256 compared to $50,379, a difference of 5.7%), and median female earnings ($41,872 compared to $39,891, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,468 compared to $86,418, a difference of 0.060%), median male earnings ($56,499 compared to $56,300, a difference of 0.35%), and per capita income ($45,854 compared to $45,663, a difference of 0.42%).
Moroccan vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricMoroccanLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,854
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Good
$104,488
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Good
$86,468
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,838
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,499
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,872
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,256
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,117
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,138
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,683
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Moroccan vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 46.2%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 39.7%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.70%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Moroccan vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricMoroccanLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.1%

Moroccan vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.6%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.8%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.7%).
Moroccan vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMoroccanLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Moroccan vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 26.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Moroccan vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMoroccanLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.7%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Exceptional
85.0%

Moroccan vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.4%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.28%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (61.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Moroccan vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMoroccanLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.22
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.8%
Exceptional
29.4%

Moroccan vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 173.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 11.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 31.5%).
Moroccan vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMoroccanLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
48.8%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.9%
Excellent
6.6%

Moroccan vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.8%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.74%).
Moroccan vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricMoroccanLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Poor
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.2%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.2%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.5%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
1.9%

Moroccan vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), male disability (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Moroccan vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricMoroccanLuxembourger
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%