Swedish vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,393,810 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 7.9 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $50,379, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $60,967, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,750 compared to $45,663, a difference of 0.19%), median earnings ($47,851 compared to $47,640, a difference of 0.44%), and median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $39,891, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), poverty (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (49.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.090%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and bachelor's degree (39.1% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.020%), ged/equivalency (88.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.0%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 4.5%).