Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Middle Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Middle Africa

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,808,596 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 32.3 Luxembourgers.
Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $97,237, a difference of 18.2%), and per capita income ($39,529 compared to $45,663, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $60,967, a difference of 4.4%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $39,891, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $50,379, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,529
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$93,593
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,559
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,416
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,201
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,965
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,916
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,254
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,293
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,375
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 41.4%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 40.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.3%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.4%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaLuxembourger
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.7%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.6%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Exceptional
85.0%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.9%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.10, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
29.4%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 90.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.4%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
89.9%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.4%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and associate's degree (44.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
58.0%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.6%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Excellent
1.9%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.3%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaLuxembourger
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Good
11.1%
Good
11.1%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%