Pueblo vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,572,138 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Pueblo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pueblo corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,012 compared to $45,663, a difference of 42.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($68,910 compared to $97,237, a difference of 41.1%), and median family income ($76,880 compared to $106,183, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,018 compared to $50,379, a difference of 11.9%), householder income over 65 years ($52,930 compared to $60,967, a difference of 15.2%), and median female earnings ($32,564 compared to $39,891, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 186.6%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 135.3%), and receiving food stamps (19.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 118.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (21.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 23.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 28.9%), and single mother poverty (37.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 86.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 71.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 29.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (80.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.4% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (53.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 82.4%), single father households (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.1%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.1%), family households (68.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 100.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (25.5% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 55.7%), master's degree (10.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 49.4%), and associate's degree (34.0% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (33.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 54.7%), and self-care disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.4%).