Pima vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,370,571 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 37.4 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,663, a difference of 49.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $103,536, a difference of 41.1%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $106,183, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,379, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,891, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $97,237, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 194.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 154.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 121.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 15.8%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 35.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 36.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 172.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 134.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 127.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 32.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 87.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 74.9%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.31%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 163.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 5.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 71.3%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 65.9%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.27%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 80.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.7%).