Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cape Verdean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cape Verdeans

Luxembourgers

Poor
Excellent
1,263
SOCIAL INDEX
10.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
317th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Cape Verdean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,467,435 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Cape Verdean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.574. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cape Verdeans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cape Verdeans corresponds to a decrease of 28.2 Luxembourgers.
Cape Verdean Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($50,077 compared to $60,967, a difference of 21.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,580 compared to $103,536, a difference of 18.2%), and wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $50,379, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($38,614 compared to $39,891, a difference of 3.3%), and median earnings ($44,640 compared to $47,640, a difference of 6.7%).
Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricCape VerdeanLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,935
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,848
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,848
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,640
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,103
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,614
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,387
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,758
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,580
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,077
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
27.4%

Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 130.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 58.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricCape VerdeanLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 52.2%), and unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.5%).
Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCape VerdeanLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (44.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.8% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.78%).
Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCape VerdeanLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.5%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.3%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.0%

Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 59.3%), births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 40.4%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (61.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCape VerdeanLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.1%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.6%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.3%
Exceptional
29.4%

Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 190.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 50.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 12.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 26.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 39.2%).
Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCape VerdeanLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.5%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
46.8%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 95.2%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 37.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricCape VerdeanLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.4%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.0%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.3%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
1.9%

Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 33.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.3%).
Cape Verdean vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricCape VerdeanLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.1%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.2%