Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guamanian/Chamorro
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guamanians/Chamorros

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Guamanian/Chamorro Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,071,672 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 28.1 Luxembourgers.
Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,678 compared to $45,663, a difference of 9.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $50,379, a difference of 6.0%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,255 compared to $86,418, a difference of 0.19%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,170 compared to $103,536, a difference of 2.3%), and median female earnings ($38,717 compared to $39,891, a difference of 3.0%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,678
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,061
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Good
$86,255
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,933
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,661
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,717
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,423
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,569
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,170
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,187
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 27.3%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.2%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.7%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLuxembourger
Poverty
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
9.1%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.2%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.3%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.2%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.7%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.0%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.86%), currently married (47.1% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (66.6% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 5.3%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
66.6%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.7%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Exceptional
29.4%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 49.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 11.3%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.5%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.2%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
6.6%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.4%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.1%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Excellent
1.9%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 18.2%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.0%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%