Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Luxembourgers

Good
Excellent
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,246,547 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 5.3 Luxembourgers.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $97,237, a difference of 31.8%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $86,418, a difference of 29.0%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $39,891, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $60,967, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $103,536, a difference of 23.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.8%), single female poverty (16.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.48%), male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLuxembourger
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLuxembourger
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 48.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
85.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 24.8%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.78%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
29.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 111.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 9.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 70.2%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.2%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
1.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongLuxembourger
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%