Zimbabwean vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,752,188 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.767. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.150% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 150.3 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $60,967, a difference of 8.0%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $86,418, a difference of 4.9%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $56,300, a difference of 0.0%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $45,663, a difference of 0.31%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $47,640, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.8%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.73%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.1%), currently married (47.0% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.92%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 68.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.3%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.75%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%).