Latvian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,177,026 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.793% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 792.8 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $45,663, a difference of 15.3%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $106,183, a difference of 13.3%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $56,300, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,379, a difference of 4.8%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $39,891, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.15%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.3%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.090%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 82.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.0%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.30%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.38%).