Seminole vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Seminole
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Seminole

Luxembourgers

Poor
Excellent
2,239
SOCIAL INDEX
19.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
265th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Seminole Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,468,327 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Seminole communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.845. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.129% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Seminole corresponds to an increase of 129.4 Luxembourgers.
Seminole Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Seminole vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Seminole and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,077 compared to $103,536, a difference of 29.3%), median family income ($83,354 compared to $106,183, a difference of 27.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,584 compared to $97,237, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,649 compared to $50,379, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($34,385 compared to $39,891, a difference of 16.0%).
Seminole vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricSeminoleLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,180
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,354
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,420
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,233
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,783
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,385
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,649
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,584
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,077
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,373
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.6%
Tragic
27.4%

Seminole vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Seminole and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 65.3%), family poverty (11.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 64.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.9%).
Seminole vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricSeminoleLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.8%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.1%

Seminole vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Seminole and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.0%).
Seminole vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSeminoleLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Seminole vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Seminole and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.8% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 7.2%).
Seminole vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSeminoleLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.0%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.5%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.1%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.4%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.1%
Exceptional
85.0%

Seminole vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Seminole and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.0%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and divorced or separated (14.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.10, a difference of 4.4%).
Seminole vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSeminoleLuxembourger
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.0%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
29.4%

Seminole vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 67.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.12%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Seminole vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSeminoleLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
6.6%

Seminole vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Seminole and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 45.6%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 44.6%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
Seminole vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricSeminoleLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Poor
93.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.3%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.1%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
1.9%

Seminole vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 49.8%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 23.1%).
Seminole vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricSeminoleLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%