Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yup'ik

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Yup'ik Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,378,380 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Yup'ik communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.890. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.120% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yup'ik corresponds to an increase of 120.1 Luxembourgers.
Yup'ik Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,518 compared to $45,663, a difference of 49.6%), median male earnings ($39,504 compared to $56,300, a difference of 42.5%), and median family income ($79,290 compared to $106,183, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,727 compared to $60,967, a difference of 0.40%), householder income under 25 years ($54,732 compared to $50,379, a difference of 8.6%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.2%).
Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricYup'ikLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,518
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,290
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,695
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,942
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,504
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,730
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,732
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$73,688
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,000
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,727
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
27.4%

Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (32.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 257.8%), married-couple family poverty (13.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 245.2%), and family poverty (18.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 159.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 13.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (27.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 29.5%), and single female poverty (26.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 30.1%).
Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricYup'ikLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.6%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
32.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.5%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
32.7%
Exceptional
9.1%

Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (18.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 283.9%), male unemployment (16.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 262.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (14.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 235.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 65.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (9.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 82.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (9.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 88.4%).
Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYup'ikLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
41.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 36.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (73.1% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 19.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (76.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (70.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 11.4%).
Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYup'ikLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.2%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.9%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
73.1%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.6%
Exceptional
85.0%

Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (5.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 141.3%), births to unmarried women (56.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 91.8%), and single mother households (10.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 79.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 10.0%), divorced or separated (10.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and family households (72.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 14.4%).
Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYup'ikLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
72.4%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
37.0%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
4.00
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
56.4%
Exceptional
29.4%

Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (45.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 756.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 69.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 40.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 62.2%).
Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYup'ikLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
58.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
6.6%

Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (19.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 104.8%), associate's degree (25.0% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 96.0%), and master's degree (8.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 79.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricYup'ikLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.1%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
45.8%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
39.4%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
19.4%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
8.5%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
1.9%

Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 243.6%), hearing disability (5.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 80.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (37.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 76.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Yup'ik vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricYup'ikLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%