Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,882,398 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.900. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 45.6 Luxembourgers.
Potawatomi Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $103,536, a difference of 22.4%), median family income ($88,265 compared to $106,183, a difference of 20.3%), and per capita income ($38,046 compared to $45,663, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $50,379, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $60,967, a difference of 12.5%).
Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricPotawatomiLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.4%

Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 42.2%), family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 41.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 13.5%).
Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Exceptional
9.1%

Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 44.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiLuxembourger
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%

Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 4.6%).
Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
85.0%

Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 23.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.8%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.0%).
Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Exceptional
29.4%

Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 65.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Excellent
6.6%

Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.6%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 27.2%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Excellent
1.9%

Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 39.4%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.6%), and ambulatory disability (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.0%).
Potawatomi vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%