Hmong vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,556,612 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.062% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 61.9 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $45,663, a difference of 19.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $103,536, a difference of 17.5%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $56,300, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.96%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $50,379, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $60,967, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 28.3%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.1%), single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 78.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.8%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.5%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 93.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.50%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.3%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 24.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.3%).