Alsatian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,739,764 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 10.8 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $41,958, a difference of 12.7%), householder income over 65 years ($61,797 compared to $54,958, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $53,911, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $39,117, a difference of 2.4%), median household income ($85,053 compared to $82,070, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,059 compared to $91,574, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 30.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 27.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.79%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 40.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and family households with children (25.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (44.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 72.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 11.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.2%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.12%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.9%).