Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Ecuadorians

Good
Poor
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,242,964 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.795. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.552% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 552.4 Ecuadorians.
Scandinavian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 27.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $54,958, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $93,739, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $39,117, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $53,911, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($46,433 compared to $45,214, a difference of 2.7%).
Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricScandinavianEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
22.9%

Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 56.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 53.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.3%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianEcuadorian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.9%

Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.1%), and unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.4%).
Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianEcuadorian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.5%

Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 38.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.43%).
Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
82.3%

Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.1%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.13%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianEcuadorian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Poor
33.3%

Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 224.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 78.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 19.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 47.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 68.1%).
Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
4.5%

Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 97.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and college, under 1 year (67.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 43.8%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Scandinavian vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%