Tsimshian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Ecuadorians
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,506,020 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.997% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 996.9 Ecuadorians.
Tsimshian vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $91,574, a difference of 6.8%), median family income ($101,543 compared to $95,114, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $54,958, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $39,117, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $53,911, a difference of 1.4%), and median household income ($83,346 compared to $82,070, a difference of 1.6%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Tsimshian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.95%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 5.7%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.9% |
Tsimshian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 119.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 52.9%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Tsimshian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.89%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 82.3% |
Tsimshian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 26.7%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (67.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Poor 33.3% |
Tsimshian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 164.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Tsimshian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 78.3%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Tsimshian vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 120.3%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 87.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.28%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age over 75 (59.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 25.0%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |