Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 302,859,343 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 8.1 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($112,527 compared to $95,114, a difference of 18.3%), median male earnings ($60,958 compared to $51,596, a difference of 18.1%), and per capita income ($49,316 compared to $41,958, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $53,911, a difference of 3.1%), median female earnings ($43,309 compared to $39,117, a difference of 10.7%), and median household income ($93,051 compared to $82,070, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 37.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 33.4%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.6%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.6%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 67.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 11.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.6%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.74%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%).