Maltese vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,736,182 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Maltese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Maltese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.417% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Maltese corresponds to an increase of 416.9 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Maltese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 25.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,754 compared to $93,739, a difference of 22.4%), and median male earnings ($62,953 compared to $51,596, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,735 compared to $53,911, a difference of 0.33%), median female earnings ($43,357 compared to $39,117, a difference of 10.8%), and median earnings ($52,526 compared to $45,214, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Maltese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 67.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 59.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and single male poverty (11.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Maltese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Maltese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Maltese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 38.8%), births to unmarried women (27.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.37%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.89%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 149.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 49.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 16.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 38.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 45.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Maltese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 82.1%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.0%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.64%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.3%).