Norwegian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 306,820,389 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 4.4 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 26.4%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $95,114, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $54,958, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $39,117, a difference of 0.81%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $53,911, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($46,865 compared to $45,214, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 75.2%), receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 66.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 50.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 48.9%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 47.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.7%), currently married (50.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.81%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (63.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 253.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 79.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 20.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 49.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 69.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 119.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.0%), and college, under 1 year (68.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.0%), female disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.4%).