Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Ecuadorians

Good
Poor
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,763,443 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.289. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.182% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 182.3 Ecuadorians.
Brazilian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.7%), median family income ($106,942 compared to $95,114, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $54,958, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $53,911, a difference of 0.79%), median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $39,117, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($48,356 compared to $45,214, a difference of 7.0%).
Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricBrazilianEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
22.9%

Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 34.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.7%), single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.7%).
Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianEcuadorian
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
14.9%

Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 20.4%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.9%).
Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianEcuadorian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.5%

Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
82.3%

Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.2%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.51%), family households (63.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianEcuadorian
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Poor
33.3%

Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 119.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.0%).
Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
4.5%

Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 43.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.4%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.94%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.98%).
Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.67%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Brazilian vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianEcuadorian
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%