Filipino vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,455,276 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.039% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to a decrease of 39.0 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($138,397 compared to $95,114, a difference of 45.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($134,910 compared to $93,739, a difference of 43.9%), and median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $51,596, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $53,911, a difference of 7.1%), median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $39,117, a difference of 26.6%), and wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 101.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 73.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.70%), single male poverty (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and single father poverty (14.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 53.2%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 44.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 118.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 37.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 47.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 135.5%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 92.9%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.3%).