Thai vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 306,072,869 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($72,135 compared to $51,596, a difference of 39.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,560 compared to $93,739, a difference of 38.2%), and median family income ($131,281 compared to $95,114, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $53,911, a difference of 9.8%), median female earnings ($47,577 compared to $39,117, a difference of 21.6%), and per capita income ($54,307 compared to $41,958, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 83.3%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 66.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.7%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and single male poverty (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and male unemployment (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 38.5%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.7%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.0%), family households (67.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (30.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 178.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 38.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 89.5%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 61.2%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 24.6%), and ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.2%).