Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,399,478 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.474. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.073% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to a decrease of 73.0 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $53,911, a difference of 12.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $91,574, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $54,958, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($93,593 compared to $95,114, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,293 compared to $93,739, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 30.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.28%), poverty (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.8%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.65%), currently married (43.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 123.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 29.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.7%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.51%), female disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.1%).