Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Poland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Poland

Ecuadorians

Good
Poor
7,802
SOCIAL INDEX
75.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
104th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Poland Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,300,637 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.100. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to a decrease of 7.2 Ecuadorians.
Immigrants from Poland Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.7%), median family income ($108,570 compared to $95,114, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,319 compared to $93,739, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $53,911, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $39,117, a difference of 6.4%), and per capita income ($45,979 compared to $41,958, a difference of 9.6%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PolandEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,979
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,570
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,549
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,633
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,452
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,630
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,474
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,065
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,319
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,041
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
22.9%

Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 41.3%), receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 40.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.9%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.8%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PolandEcuadorian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.5%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.9%

Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PolandEcuadorian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%

Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PolandEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.6%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.3%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
82.3%

Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PolandEcuadorian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.2%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.9%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 115.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.1%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PolandEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.6%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.6%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
4.5%

Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 42.3%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and bachelor's degree (39.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.92%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PolandEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Average
97.4%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.6%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.5%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.2%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.1%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.0%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Good
15.4%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.93%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PolandEcuadorian
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.1%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%